Sign up for the mailing list to receive a 10% discount off your first order
Open mobile app


JoMon–Fri: 11:00 AM — 4:00 PM
Hello! Need help? Tell me what’s up, and I’ll be happy to assist 💁
A leading contrarian thinker explores the ethical paradox at the heart of history's wounds.
The conventional wisdom about historical memory is summed up in George Santayana’s celebrated phrase: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Today, the consensus that it is moral to remember and immoral to forget is nearly absolute. And yet, is this right?
David Rieff, an independent writer who has reported on bloody conflicts in Africa, the Balkans, and Central Asia, insists that things are not so simple. He poses hard questions about whether remembrance ever truly has—or indeed ever could—“inoculate” the present against repeating the crimes of the past.
Rieff explores these ideas by drawing on some of the defining conflicts of modern times, including:
His contentious, brilliant, and elegant essay delivers a pellucid examination of the uses and abuses of historical memory. This indispensable work of moral philosophy challenges deeply held assumptions and invites readers to rethink the ethics of remembering versus forgetting.
Sign up for the mailing list to receive a 10% discount off your first order


Hello! Need help? Tell me what’s up, and I’ll be happy to assist 💁
