Sign up for the mailing list to receive a 10% discount off your first order
Open mobile app


JoMon–Fri: 11:00 AM — 4:00 PM
Hello! Need help? Tell me what’s up, and I’ll be happy to assist 💁
The New England Journal of Medicine is one of the most important general medical journals in the world. Doctors rely on the conclusions it publishes, and most do not have the time to look beyond abstracts to examine methodology or question assumptions. Many of its pronouncements are conveyed by the media to a mass audience, which is likely to take them as authoritative. But is this trust entirely warranted?
Theodore Dalrymple, a doctor retired from practice, turned a critical eye upon a full year of the Journal, alert to dubious premises and to what is left unsaid. In False Positive, he demonstrates that:
When the Journal addresses social questions, its perspective is solidly politically correct:
The Journal reads as if there were only one possible point of view, even though the American medical profession (to say nothing of the extensive foreign readership) cannot possibly be in total agreement with the stances taken in its pages. It is thus more megaphone than sounding board.
There is indeed much in the New England Journal of Medicine that deserves praise and admiration. However, this book encourages the general reader to:

Sign up for the mailing list to receive a 10% discount off your first order


Hello! Need help? Tell me what’s up, and I’ll be happy to assist 💁
